
Why should this topic be dealt with?
For two simple reasons:
Because it arouses or at least it should arouse particular interest;
We have realized that this topic cannot be just a prerogative of steel processing companies but it should involve also the consignees of our products.
To explain clearly;
There are some standards settling quality classes, defect depth, allowed reject percentages. There are few customers placing orders according to the standards in force and the customers knowing the real standard content are even fewer.
An informed customer is generally a careful customer requiring what the current technology can reasonably assure. Anyway we will come back to this subject with some examples.
First of all let’s define the concept of defect:
Defects are flaws which due to their nature, size, position inside a piece are considered by the standard or by the applicable inspection specification to be detrimental to the material use.
In particular surface defects are discontinuities appearing on the surface, detectable by visual check or by non destructive test (eddy currents, magnetoscopic test, test by penetrating fluids etc) and without material removal.
Classification of surface defects on the basis of the processing giving rise to them:
Defects formed during the production of hot rolled products:
Defects formed during cold processing. Among the most distinctive defects we can find:
Defects due to wrong handling .
The UNI EN 10277-1:2000 standard and the surface quality of cold-finished products:
The general standard for cold-finished products deals thoroughly with material surface quality and the relevant defects.
As defects like cracks, scales, laps cannot be completely eliminated during production of warm rolled products and cannot even be removed by drawing, a quality standard should be agreed by supplier and customer.
UNI EN 10277-1:2000 supports us.
It defines 4 surface quality classes:
Classes 1, 2 and 3 refer to drawn products with round, square, hexagonal section or to flat products.
Class 4 refers only to peeled or ground products.
Let’s see in detail the parameters differentiating the surface quality classes:
Below you will find a table summarizing the content of the European standard UNI EN 10277 –1:2000
| Surface quality classes | |||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
||||
| Diameter or width (mm) | d ≤ 15 | d ≤ 15 | d ≤ 20 | - | |||
| Defect depth (mm) | max. 0,30 | max. 0,30 | max. 0,20 | Technically free from manufacturing cracks | |||
|
Surface quality classes
|
|||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
||||
| Diameter or width (mm) | 15 < d ≤ 100 | 15 < d ≤ 75 | 20 < d ≤ 75 | - | |||
| Defect depth (mm) | max. 0,02 x d | max. 0,02 x d | max. 0,01 x d | Technically free from manufacturing cracks | |||
|
Surface quality classes
|
|||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
||||
| Diameter or width (mm) | - | d > 75 | d > 75 | - | |||
| Defect depth (mm) | - | max. 1,50 | max. 0,75 | Technically free from manufacturing cracks | |||
| class 1 | class 2 | class 3 | class 4 |
| 4% | 1% | 1% | 0,20% |
Limitation in the class choice due to the product shape (round, square, hexagon etc.)
Cold finished products of